🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – going beyond the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. Lange, an expert in elections who grew up in the city, devoted over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that the progressive candidate would win although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his newsletter, his platform. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, stretching from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that since they were adding around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of votes added later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Coalition Building

How did the mayor-elect get additional support from?

He assembled the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, working- and middle-class voters, compared to the primary. Additionally he boosted his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and people struggling with costs

Additionally, there were some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in immigrant strongholds that supported Trump previously backed Zohran now. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the election was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Each candidate. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a huge number of participants. There was a decent anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he does because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a spoiler.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on the island with a strong turnout. I believe there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

In my view existed some weakening of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the property owners and homeowners all went for the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. But overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

Prior to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he did well. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. Plus, you have newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will commie corridor become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that key figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities we face.