🔗 Share this article

The nation's controversial action to ban social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward comparable measures.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and networks are "stealing our kids' innocence". A law may be passed in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged the legislature to pass a law lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a advisory resolution supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is provided. While it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid starting point," commented the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

In the UK, the leadership has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Earlier, interest built behind a proposal to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who took her own life after viewing disturbing social media material contends that a strict age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to build products and services that are secure and age appropriate for children," said a leading peer.

America: A Decentralized Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily occurring at the regional government level amid national inaction.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has passed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from joining social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also passed bills mandating parental consent for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from some politicians to mimic Australia's path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

International Perspectives

Apart from these regions, other countries are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world agencies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The agency notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

Even as this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and its followers indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.